PDMZ-NZAboutMission and ObjectivesMembershipContactEventsPDMA-NZ BlogDiscussion ForumJobsLinksFAQ
 
 PDMA-NZ Blog 
Wednesday, 22 April 2009

22 April 2009

Search begins for New Zealand’s leading innovators

Bayer, a global leader in innovation, is looking for New Zealand’s most innovative people to enter the Bayer Innovators Awards, in association with the National Business Review.

The awards, which recognise top innovators in the fields of Science and Health; Design and Engineering; Agriculture and Environment; Research and Development; and Information Technology and Communications, are open for entries until 29 May 2009.

Bayer New Zealand would like to hear from individuals who are involved in a successful innovation or innovative project, or who are recognised by colleagues as an ideas person with innovative successes.

Bayer Corporate Communications Manager William Malpass said that as a global company with a proud history in research and development, Bayer had always recognised the link between innovation and business success.

“That’s why we’re once again teaming up with the National Business Review to find New Zealand’s most innovative people through the Bayer Innovators Awards 2009,” he said.    

“It may be that you are involved in an exciting project or know someone who is. If that is the case, then we want to hear from you.”

The National Business Review will showcase the top innovators from each of the categories and winners will be announced at a special cocktail event on 25 August 2009.

Mr Malpass said this was the third year the Awards had been held and each year they went from strength to strength.

Entries for the awards are now open and can be made through the website www.bayerinnovators.co.nz. Closing date for entries is 29 May 2009.

Previous winners include university researchers such as Dr Johan Verbeek (Waikato University) and Olaf Diegel (AUT), manufacturers such as Ross McKenzie from Old Fashioned Foods and designers such as Ray Avery from Medicine Mondiale.

For more information visit: www.bayerinnovators.co.nz

POSTED BY: David Stokes AT 04:00 am   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this
Monday, 20 April 2009
By David Stokes, New Product Development and Innovation Professional
Hi

I mentioned in one of my earlier blogs about decision making, that it was based on a paper I presented at a conference. In fact, it was a project management conference. I had been in project management for over 10 years, but at Navman I got more involved in implementing product development best-practices (Stage-Gate) across the organisation (which included project management best practices). Because I had learnt a lot about techniques to improve the effectiveness of decision making decision due to its importance in Stage-Gate, I thought that other project managers would be interested in it – after all, don’t all projects involve some sort of decision making?
While the paper seem relatively well received, I got a question from a couple of the people who had never worked in a product development environment, which stumped me at the time: why are product development projects done in that way, with so much focus on the decision making at the gates?  In fact, I could sense their unease that the power and control of the project manager was significantly diminished by having multiple gates throughout the duration of the project in which the project could potentially be killed.
So that got me thinking.... why are product development project different from other projects, eg: IT, construction, etc ?
Here’s some ideas:
       Multidisciplinary
Product development projects often involve quite a number of people across many functional areas, eg: product management, marketing, financial, operations, manufacturing, support, supply chain, marcoms, etc. Therefore it requires the coordination of a wide range of functional areas and interdependent activities across the organisation. In order to ensure that all these come together in perfect unison at the launch of the product, there are a number of check points (AKA Gates) in the projects where it is validated that each of the disciplines are where they should be at that point in the project. 
       It’s a funnel!
Early on in a product development project, it’s not always known whether the product is going to be a success or not. There are many factors, internal (cost, technical, resource availability, etc) and external (market trends, competitors, regulatory, etc) that can impact whether a product will be a success. So early on, the focus is on trying to determine whether if the company develops the product, it will be a success or not, eg: market assessment, business case, etc. But this check is done not just at the start, but all the way through the project. As the project progresses through the stages, more accurate and reliable information becomes available which may influence whether the project should continue. Also, things change! An assumption made about the market earlier on in the project proves to be incorrect – now the business case doesn’t stack up. So rather than the project continue with the risk of being a failure, a decision is made to kill the project and those resources can then be focused on another project that has greater likelihood of being successful.
 
       Product Launch
Once the project is complete there are a number of operational support activities that need kick-in and operate smoothly as the product is launched into the market
 
       New Product Development
Products can have unique requirements and may be reliant on technologies that don’t currently exist or still need to be commercialised
 
Stage-Gate
 
Over the years product development best-practices have been developed and improved/refined across a significant number of companies and industries. One of the most widely used is Stage-Gate.
 
In trying to explain Stage-Gate from a project management perspective, what I say is that Stage-Gate is Project Management for Product Development Projects.
So here’s a list of some of the key attributes of Stage-Gate and I’ve highlighted the aspects of project management they cover:
  • A project phase is the equivalent of a stage in a product development Stage-Gate process and gates are decision making points
  • Stage-Gate framework  provides the top-level Project Work-Breakdown-Structure (WBS) and what (deliverables) needs to be done when (which stage) - Scope Management & Time Management
  • Stage deliverables contain the information required to make a go / no-go decision at the gate at the end of the stage. This include key metrics - “if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it”, eg: cost - Cost Management
  • Stage-Gate is based on having a cross-functional project team working together on a project to develop a new product - Projectised / Matrix team structure – Human Resource Management and Integration Management
  • Project governance is provided via the Gate-Keepers, a cross-functional decision making team, who review the project at each of the scheduled gate reviews. Their decision is based on the information provided by the project team in the form of predefined stage deliverables for the particular stage in the product development lifecycle
  • Stage-Gate is a Risk Management technique that focuses on reducing risk throughout the product development lifecycle
  • Focus the early stages on scoping the project and product requirements
  • At each of the gates, risk is assessed across each of the functional disciplines by the gatekeepers
  • Stage-Gate provides a common framework and terminology that improves communication. Communications Management
  • The gates provide standardised review points that facilitate more effective decision making. It clearly defines what information is required (based on a standardised set of deliverables), the decision that needs to be made (go / no-go / redirect) and the roles & responsibilities of the decision makers in making the decision Human Resource Management
  • You can have different Stage-Gate process for different types of projects (type of product, product vs. technology) that require different processes or level of detail (based on size or level of risk)
  • Stage-Gate can be applied to the “front-end” of the product lifecycle, to evaluate product ideas to select the ideas that have the most likelihood of being successful. Additionally, it allows for the management of the projects as a portfolio, selecting the projects that provide the best “mix” of projects (eg: risk, innovativeness) that will generate the best “value” for the company (eg: revenue, market share, etc)
So what do you think – do you agree? Are there aspects of project management that are not covered in some way by Stage-Gate?
 
Cheers
David
POSTED BY: David Stokes AT 09:00 am   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
Remember that there are some interesting and useful articles from PDMA in it's publications:
 
Visions Magazine
 
Some examples in the March Issue:

JPIM (Journal of Product Innovation Management)
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118487224/home

Here are some examples, but note that you need to become a PDMA member to access the full articles:

POSTED BY: pdma-nz AT 12:27 am   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this
Monday, 13 April 2009

INNOVATIONZ is running a series of workshops, organised into four episodes:

WHY? [PREDICT]

Why does the business exist? Why are we under threat? Why are things such a mess? Why is innovation important? Why do we have to think about environmental benefits? Why do we have to think long term?

WHO? [PULL]

Who are we addressing? Who are we working for? Who are our competitors? Who are our customers users and markets? Who will they be in future? Who offers new opportunities?

HOW? [PUSH]

How do we make things? How do we build businesses? How do we keep up with leading technologies? How do we construct effective teams? How do we build know-how? How do we sustain originality in design and innovation? How do we stay ahead of the game? How do we construct enduring high-quality offerings? [Products,services,environments,experiences]

WHAT? [PROCESS]

What are we doing? What are we making? What are our business models? What are our views of innovation? What use do we make of creativity? What if we operated an entirely different way?

When

APRIL 21 PROCESS 6.00-8.30 PM

MODELS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

TOUGH CREATIVITY

 

APRIL 28 PULL  6.00-8.30 PM

NEW OPPORTUNITIES

EMPATHIC BUSINESS

 

MAY 5 PUSH  6.00-8.30 PM

TECHNOLOGY TAKES COMMAND

PIONEERING WITH LESS RISK

 

MAY 12 PREDICT  6.00-8.30 PM

FUTURE IMPERFECT

PREDICTIONS AND YOUR SCENARIOS

For further information contact

Rainer Seidel email: rha.seidel@auckland.ac.nz

http://www.innovationz.org/activities/dinz
POSTED BY: PDMA-NZ Team AT 12:10 am   |  Permalink   |  1 Comment  |  E-mail this
Sunday, 12 April 2009

Great effort, wrong direction!!

Over recent years many companies have put a great deal of effort into getting their product development process right. For many, an emphasis on stage-gate, and the implementation of processes around it, has become synonymous with getting their product development right. But does doing your product development right, having all the right processes and practices in place, guarantee product development success.

How often do we stop to consider whether all that good product development effort is focussed in the most appropriate direction? Are we doing the right things as well as doing things right? Surveys have indicated that 40 percent of the effort that goes into product development goes into products that will never be successful. Also, companies that are best in class at product portfolio management are four times more likely to achieve margin premiums of 75% or higher for new products. Why? In many cases, because wrong decisions have been made during the development process. But, often, the decision to embark on the development of a product was ill-informed.

The product concept didn’t fit with other products in the company’s portfolio; a lack of technical resources to adequately develop the product; a lack of financial resources to properly launch the product etc. In short, there was a lack of strategic direction at the front end of product development. A lack of real portfolio planning and analysis that informed the decision-making on what products are best for the company to develop. For an introductory article on portfolio management see “New product portfolio management: practices and performance by Cooper Edgett and Kleinshmidt, J. Product Innovation Management 1999”. More detail is provided in the book “portfolio Management by the same authors.

POSTED BY: Allan Anderson AT 11:09 pm   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this
Sunday, 12 April 2009

The new university year started a month ago and, at Massey University in the Bachelor of Engineering degree, the 4th year students, majoring in product development, have started their final year projects. This year we have 18 students on the Albany and Palmerston North campuses working on a diverse range of products from in-line pipe inspection to an electric cheese grater. Company sponsorship of most projects provides the students with a “near to real world” context within which to develop a product all the way from initial idea through, prototype design, manufacturing planning, marketing commercialisation and overall feasibility analysis.

For further information contact Dr Aruna Shekar or Professor Allan Anderson at Massey Univesrity.

POSTED BY: Aruna Shekar AT 11:07 pm   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this
Sunday, 12 April 2009
My wife and I managed to organise a babysitter last weekend and decided to go to the movies. There didn’t seem many decent movies, but we noticed Duplicity starring Clive Owen and Julia Roberts, so thought it might be OK. As it ended up it was about product development!  It is a story of two big American FMCG companies competing tooth and nail. Clive and Julia played character involved in corporate espionage between the two companies. It was an interesting movie and makes me wonder if this is really what it is like for those sorts of companies – I suspect it does happen! Anyway, I won’t tell you the ending and spoil it for you. If you are interested in seeing it at the movies, you’ll need to get in quickly because the showings in the theatres is nearing the end, but I’m sure it will be on DVD pretty soon.
POSTED BY: David Stokes AT 11:04 pm   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this

Terms and Conditions of Use                                                                                  Website Feedback                                                                         Send me newsletters and updates